On today’s episode of Decoder, we’re going to try and figure out “digital god.” I figured we’ve been doing this long enough, let’s just get after it. Can we build an artificial intelligence so powerful that it changes the world and answers all of our questions? The AI industry has decided the answer is yes.
In September, OpenAI’s Sam Altman published a blog post claiming we’ll have superintelligent AI in “a few thousand days.” And earlier this month, Dario Amodei, the CEO of OpenAI competitor Anthropic, published a 14,000-word post laying out what exactly he thinks such a system will be capable of when it arrives, which he says could be as soon as 2026.
What’s fascinating is that the visions laid out in both posts are so similar — they both promise dramatic superintelligent AI that will bring massive improvements to work, to science and healthcare, and even to democracy and prosperity. Digital god, baby.
But while the visions are similar, the companies are, in many ways, openly opposed: Anthropic is the original OpenAI defection story. Dario and a cohort of fellow researchers left OpenAI in 2021 after becoming concerned with its increasingly commercial direction and approach to safety, and they created Anthropic to be a safer, slower AI company. And the emphasis was really on safety until recently; just last year, a major New York Times profile of the company called it the “white-hot center of A.I. doomerism.”
But the launch of ChatGPT, and the generative AI boom that followed, kicked off a colossal tech arms race, and now, Anthropic is as much in the game as anyone. It’s taken in billions in funding, mostly from Amazon, and built Claude, a chatbot and language model to rival OpenAI’s GPT-4. Now, Dario is writing long blog posts about spreading democracy with AI.
So what’s going on here? Why is the head of Anthropic suddenly talking so optimistically about AI, when he was previously known for being the safer, slower alternative to the progress-at-all-costs OpenAI? Is this just more AI hype to court investors? And if AGI is really around the corner, how are we even measuring what it means for it to be safe?
To break it all down, I brought on Verge senior AI reporter Kylie Robison to discuss what it means, what’s going on in the industry, and whether we can trust these AI leaders to tell us what they really think.
If you’d like to read more about some of the news and topics we discussed in this episode, check out the links below:
- Machines of Loving Grace | Dario Amodei
- The Intelligence Age | Sam Altman
- Anthropic’s CEO thinks AI will lead to a utopia | The Verge
- AI manifestos flood the tech zone | Axios
- OpenAI just raised $6.6 billion to build ever-larger AI models | The Verge
- OpenAI was a research lab — now it’s just another tech company | The Verge
- Anthropic’s latest AI update can use a computer on its own | The Verge
- Agents are the future AI companies promise — and desperately need | The Verge
- California governor vetoes major AI safety bill | The Verge
- Inside the white-hot center of AI doomerism | NYT
- Microsoft and OpenAI’s close partnership shows signs of fraying | NYT
- The $14 billion question dividing OpenAI and Microsoft | WSJ
- Anthropic has floated $40 billion valuation in funding talks | The Information
Decoder with Nilay Patel /
A podcast from The Verge about big ideas and other problems.
